Laserfiche WebLink
act .y <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For Council Meeting of October 6, 1992 <br />TO: Honorable Mayo and Cit cil <br />FROM: Gar a er Public Utilities Y t sties Director <br />SUBJECT: Report on Tertiary Treatment Project for Date: September 28, 1992 <br />the City of Colton <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On September 11, 1992, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RVVQCB) adopted <br />Order No. 92-50 (Attachment #1). This Order, which amended the previous Cease and <br />Desist Order No. 92-24, requires the City of Colton to begin design of advanced <br />wastewater treatment facilities by October 1, 1992 in compliance with a revised <br />time schedule of the Cease and Desist Order. The RMQCB action is in response to <br />earlier requests by the Cities of Colton and San Bernardino for sufficient time <br />to evaluate the information from the Rapid Infiltration Extraction (RIX) demon- <br />stration to project which was completed in April, 1992. <br />The RIX project has shown that its natural filtration treatment is as effective <br />and reliable as conventional filtration in producing effluent quality that meets <br />Title 22 Pre -disinfection Turbidity requirements of the State of California Depart- <br />ment of Health. Since this has now been established, the R410CB is requiring <br />immediate action to implement advanced wastewater treatment, either utilizing the <br />RIX or conventional filtration. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Because of our concerns as to which advanced treatment process might be the most <br />cost effective in meeting the City's discharge requirements, the City hired Kennedy - <br />Jenks, Consulting Engineers, to perform an evaluatikon which compared the estimated <br />costs of the RIX and conventional treatment processes. Their evaluation concluded <br />that the RIX would be least cost alternative (Attachment #2). The RIX alternative <br />construction cost was estimated at $22,812,000.00, and the conventional treatment <br />construction cost was estimated at $31,132,000.00. The estimated annual operating <br />costs were similar with the RIX estimated at $2,246,000.00/year, and conventional <br />estimated at $2,402,000.00/year. Furthermore, Kennedy -Jenks suggested that there <br />might be other benefits that could be realized from the RIX process, such as greater <br />nitrogen removal than previously known from the demonstration project. This could <br />result in additional savings from a reduction in nitrogen removal facilities at <br />the existing wastewater treatment plant. <br />Attachments: 2 <br />Page I ofd_— Item No. <br />