My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN AUG 02 I29
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 August 02 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN AUG 02 I29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 1:34:06 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:38:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REPORT <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />For City Council Meeting of <br />August 2, 1994 <br />July 27, 1994 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attor e <br />Y// <br />f <br />f <br />SUBJECT: REFUSE PERMITS/ BFI <br />As the City Council requested at the July 19, 1994 City Council meeting, I have <br />reviewed our files regarding Refuse Collection permits as they apply to Browning-Ferris <br />Industries, Inc. ("BFI"). The Council has asked that the history of our current Refuse Collection <br />ordinance be reviewed along with the status of our current refuse collection permits of record. <br />Background <br />In late 1989, the City requested a legal opinion from Best, Best & Krieger regarding the <br />City's ability to terminate then existing refuse collection franchises. The inquiry arose as a <br />result of the City's action in August of 1989 to increase City refuse hauling rates. At that time <br />it was noted that while the City held the exclusive right to collect residential refuse, the City had <br />to compete for commercial and industrial business. Due to regulations that applied to the City's <br />refuse collection service and not to private haulers, the City could not effectively compete in this <br />area and was losing virtually all new commercial and industrial business to private haulers <br />operating under a City franchise. It was determined that the best interests of the City were not <br />being served because the City was limited to cost intensive residential refuse collection and was <br />squeezed out of the more lucrative commercial and business accounts, including apartment <br />building accounts. Essentially, the City had cut-off its own potential sources of revenue by <br />granting private franchises to independent haulers. <br />Termination of Refuse Collection Franchises <br />Best, Best & Krieger advised the City by memorandum dated October 10, 1989, that it <br />could terminate existing refuse collection franchises, but that a five year notice period was <br />required under applicable California law. Based upon that advice, City Manager Leslie Keane <br />presented a report to the City Council on October 17, 1989. At the meeting, the City Council <br />adopted staff's recommendations establishing a policy to disallow new refuse collection <br />franchises and directing staff to give appropriate notice to existing refuse haulers that their <br />franchises would be terminated in five years. Staff was also directed to return to the City <br />Council in "November of 1993, or thereabouts," with a report and recommendations regarding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.