Laserfiche WebLink
SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE <br />CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION <br />TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 61 1996. <br />CITY TREASURER'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Summary 9/30/95 <br />Mayor Fulp asked the City Treasurer if this monthly report could include <br />a listing of separate accounts; how much is deposited in each account <br />and to include the net balance in each account. City Treasurer Williams <br />said that Finance Department would be able to do that as he worked from <br />figures provided in gross amounts. Mayor Fulp inquired about the <br />directive to have accounts established for the Electric Department. <br />City Treasurer Williams reported there was no problem with the <br />directive; there was compliance. <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Cash Flow Analysis Report <br />Finance Director Vega introduced Finance Assistant Bonnie Johnson who <br />continued with the presentation on the cash flow analysis. There was <br />discussion on encumbrances, allocations and anticipated revenue. <br />Finance Director Vega stated that the general fund is standing on its <br />own; that the sum of $300,000 is enough to pay shortfalls and upon <br />review of the monthly activity, under cumulative total, the general fund <br />has had cash and no deficit in any one month. Calling upon her eight <br />and a half years of experience, Finance Assistant Johnson said she has <br />seen the same month to month fluctuations and the same revenue patterns <br />in other municipalities. She commented that municipalities do not have <br />wide choice as revenues are not coming in. Mayor Fulp requested that <br />the monthly cash flow analysis report include the total dollar amount of <br />encumbrances to the City. Discussion followed as to audits in progress <br />and anticipated. <br />Teeter Plan <br />Finance Director Vega reported that the County has provided information <br />to the cities asking them to participate in the "Teeter Plan" which <br />allows the City to receive delinquent property taxes from the County of <br />San Bernardino. Under the plan, the City would receive 95% of secured <br />property taxes. She identified a deadline and suggested there was a <br />need to do an analysis. It was estimated that $186,000 could be <br />realized this fiscal year if this plan was adopted. Councilmember <br />Hutton asked what amount of money would the City lose in the future if <br />the plan was approved. Director Vega stated that the City would lose <br />11% annually. Under the plan, the County would take the responsibility <br />of guaranteeing the property taxes. <br />City Manager Martinez cautioned that if the City enters into the <br />agreement, it cannot get out of it. <br />4 <br />OCT 2 5 1995 <br />