1995 MIN NOV 07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Audit/Funds for the last two years. He requested that staff respond at the next Council Meeting. Item was not continued and response and questions were provided by Anna Vega, Finance Director and Nabar Martinez, City Manager. Staff was directed by Mayor Fulp to bring back at the next Council Meeting the audit reports relating to the Gas Tax, Measure I Funds, and the Community Development CDBG Funds. RECESS• At 8:29 p.m. Mayor Fulp declared a recess and reconvened at 8:40 p.m. All Councilmembers present. PUBLIC HEARING• Helen Ramos, City Clerk, announced that noticed for today was a Public Hearing which was duly published and notice mailed to the people involved in the Appeal, #DC -3795, Valley Colton Fuel Stop Inc. This was inadvertently left off of the Agenda, therefore, the Public Hearing will be renoticed and will be heard on Novem- ber 28, 1995. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Study. Sanitation & Recycling Divisions Final Report by R.W. Beck Gracie Harmon, Personnel Director, informed Council that staff was ready to present the Final Report on the Management Study on the Sanitation and Recycling Divisions by R.W. Beck. Ms. Harmon gave a brief background which included the preliminary draft report presentation at a joint workshop to the Utility Commission and City Council on September 11, 1995, and the final draft presentation to the Utility Commission on October 23, 1995. Richard Tagore, R.W. Beck, provided to each Member of the dais the R.W. Beck, Management Study for the Sanitation and Recycling Division, dated November 7, 1995. The following items from the study were reviewed: Presentation Agenda; Project Goals; Scope of Project; OPTION I: Status Quo; OPTION II: Collection System Optimization; OPTION III: Privatize Collection; Comparison of Cost Impacts; Comparison of Impact on City Operations; Cost Estimate for OPTION II: Collection System Optimization; and Cost Estimate for OPTION III: Privatization. Councilmember Sandoval questioned the following areas and con- cerns: 15% franchise fee; What is the over-all figure for poten- tial revenue for the entire City; Franchise Fees paid in the last year not calculated in OPTION II; Possible revenue of approxi- mately $4.5 million if the City were to provide the service that 7 NOV 0 7 1995