Laserfiche WebLink
load becomes larger in a commercial account, it costs less to serve and this is reflected in the <br />rate design. As we get above certain baseline allowances in energy charges. As we add energy <br />into the system, it is cheaper for us to buy. <br />Conversely, Director Clarke said this did not apply to the residential side. The increase in cost, <br />generally associated with air-conditioning load at peak times during the summer months, is the <br />more expensive power the City has to buy. The baseload is assigned to this, as the City has to <br />buy and have energy under contract when the peak period hits. Discussion had on air- <br />conditioning use. Councilmember Bennett asked for a memorandum -report on how Edison <br />handles their commercial accounts and if they offer similar discounts, Electric Director Clarke <br />said his department had provided a typical, monthly comparison, to Council, within the past <br />week. Director Clarke said he would re -issue the information. <br />Discussion followed on deposits for start-up service charged the residents, specifically Page 47, <br />Policy 27 and Page 25, Policy 15, provision 5. Councilmember Bennett asked that the policy <br />include the provision to allow a resident with A-1 credit to obtain waiver of the deposit or <br />reduction of $25.00 per hook-up. Finance Director Vega said that next Council Meeting she <br />would present a system for checking credit and waiver of deposit. She said It was customer <br />friendly and it had been discussed with the Utilities Commission. <br />In response to what the City has lost on people who do not pay their bills on an annual basis, <br />Director Vega informed that through 1992-93 the City lost $305,000, about 1.6% of actual <br />revenues. Prior to 1992, the average was $150,000. <br />Ms. Jean Hart presented her bill and asked how the PCA charge was calculated. Electric Utility <br />Director Clarke explained that it was based on calculation per kilowatt hour, approximately one- <br />half cent per kilowatt hour. <br />Mr. Charles Jackson asked that if there is a write off of 200,000, what is the recovery? There <br />was discussion on the recovery efforts. Electric Utility Director Clarke remarked that in FY <br />1994-95, the write-off is $216,244, considered lost income, with anticipated recovery expected <br />at 40%. He pointed out that losses are assessed to other customers, approximately 1/10th of a <br />cent per kilowatt hours, for recovery. Upon inquiry, Director Clarke stated that lien process <br />cannot be used for electric bill recovery. <br />STAFF REPORTS <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Finance and Cash Flow Analysis Report <br />Discussion had regarding the timing of the financial report. To avoid delay, she suggested <br />continuing the item to the next meeting which would allow timely reports. Mayor Fulp asked <br />inclusion of cash balance information and Finance Director Vega agreed. Mayor Fulp inquired <br />4 <br />MAR 2 0 1996 <br />