1993 AGN JAN 05 I11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Planning Commission November 24, 1992 Page 4 Rick Marquez, 3900 Main Street, Riverside - stated that he is employed by the City of Riverside. Mr. Marquez stated that the City of Riverside has nearby wells that supply 20% of Riverside's water. Additionally, they're concerned that if this project is approved it may contaminate their City's water supply. Socorro A. Rosales, 604 Agua Mansa, Colton - stated that he is concerned with Blue Ribbon's operation and he does not want to have another problem in the area. Joe Jackson, 124 N. Orange, Riverside - stated that he has farmed for 18 years and this operation will provide soil amendments for organic farming. Public Hearing Closed Commissioner Prieto made a motion to accept File Index Number DC -79-92 with a Negative Declaration, traffic fee to be determined by public Works, landscaping in phases, and interim waste water system. Commissioner Wyatt seconded the motion. The motion was carried. FILE INDEX NUMBER DC -61-92 G. W. SINGLErARY Mr. Zamora stated the request is for modifications of Conditions of Approval. Mr. Zamora stated that the traffic mitigation fee was originally over $30,000 and has been adjusted to approximately $11,000. Public Hearing Opened Charles Sheaffer, P. O. Box 53110, San Jose - stated that he feels the new fee is not equitable but plans to proceed with the project. G. W. Singletary, 1733 Mass Ave., Riverside - stated that there are inequities in determining the traffic fee and gave examples of other project's fees versus their fee. Public Hearing Closed After a lengthy discussion concerning traffic mitigation fees, Commissioner Wyatt noted discrepancies in the Conditions of Approval based upon the decisions made at the last meeting. Ms. Biggs stated that the Commission can direct Staff to compare the minutes with the conditions for clerical corrections. Vice -Chairperson Vega made a motion to approve File Index Number DC -61-92 and directed Staff to review the Conditions of Approval under Miscellaneous #8 and #9 and Aesthetics #2. Commissioner Prieto seconded the motion. The motion was carried.