Laserfiche WebLink
LAW OFFICES OF <br />BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP <br />the proposed project and water received in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, and <br />contracts. <br />If the public water system concludes that the water supply is, or will be, insufficient, <br />it must submit plans for acquiring additional water supplies. If a city or county is unable to identify <br />any public water system that may supply water for the project, it must prepare the water supply <br />assessment itself. Regardless of what entity prepares it, the water supply assessment must be included <br />in any environmental document prepared for the project. <br />To address this new requirement, a new section entitled Consultation with Water <br />Agencies Regarding Large Development Projects, has been added to the Initial Study chapter of your <br />Local Guidelines. <br />Water Supplies {or Large Development Prow <br />SB 221 enacts new requirements to address the water supply needs of large <br />development projects. Public agencies are now prohibited from approving tentative maps, certain <br />parcel maps or development agreements for subdivisions of property into more than 500 dwelling <br />units, unless the approving agency: (1) provides written verification from the applicable public water <br />system that a sufficient water supply is available, or (2) under certain circumstances, makes a <br />specified finding that sufficient water supplies are, or will be, available prior to completion of the <br />project. <br />If the written verification provided by the applicable public water system indicates that <br />the public water system is unable to provide sufficient water to serve the project's ultimate water <br />needs, the public agency cannot approve the project unless it makes a finding that the record contains <br />substantial evidence that additional water supplies not accounted for by the public water system are, <br />or will be, available prior to completion of the subdivision. If the public water system fails to deliver <br />the written verification, the public agency or any other interested party may seek a writ of mandamus <br />to compel the public water system to comply, and the approving agency may make a finding regarding <br />the available water supply based on the substantial evidence in the record. <br />To address this new requirement, a new section entitled Subdivisions with More than <br />500 Dwelling Units, has been added to the Initial Study chapter of your Local Guidelines. <br />2001 CEQA CASE LAw <br />Summarized below are a few ofthe 2001 cases involving the application of CEQA that <br />may be of interest to you. One of these cases, Communities for a Better Environment v. California <br />Resources Agency, Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. OOCS00300, is noteworthy because <br />it invalidated 8 portions of the State CEQA Guidelines (§§ 15064(h), 15064(i)(3), 15064(i)(4), <br />15130(a)(4), 15130(b)(1)(13)(2), 15152(f)(2), 15152(0(3)(C), and 15378(b)(5).) Your Local <br />Guidelines have been revised as appropriate to track these changes to the State CEQA Guidelines. <br />RVPC13\CITY,625913 <br />-3 <br />d' , <br />