Laserfiche WebLink
3 0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Assessment District No. 79-1 <br />Director of Community Services Calvin Wang reported on Assessment District No. <br />79-1, established October 7, 1980, and consideration of several additional <br />petitions from the various developers and landowners to the north and northeast <br />of the original assessment district requesting the inclusion of their area as a <br />part of Assessment District No. 79-1, to facilitate the joint construction of a <br />major water transmission pipeline from the West San Bernardino County Water Dis- <br />trict and sanitary sewer mains and storm drain facilities. <br />Mr. Wang stated Staff recommends the acceptance of these petitions at this time, <br />direct the Superintendent of Streets to include the petitioned area into the <br />District, and report back for formal action approving the amended District <br />boundary map. <br />Moved by Councilwoman Garcia, seconded by Mayor Gonzales, to approve Staff's recom- <br />mendation as outlined concerning Assessment District No. 79-1. Unanimous vote. <br />Construction & Engineering Planning Files <br />Fogg Street Grade Separation Project <br />Director of Community Services Calvin Wang reported on the Fogg Street Grade Separa- <br />tion Project, advising that Staff has presented this project to the Planning Com- <br />mission at a meeting held March 10, 1981, and the Commission has taken formal action <br />acknowledging the proposed project and has found that this project will not adverse- <br />ly affect the General Plan or environment. <br />Mr. Wang advised that Staff and the consultants plan to attend the Public Utilities <br />Commission hearing scheduled for March 31, 1981, after City Council consideration <br />of this project. <br />Mr. Richard Neill, Structural Engineer with Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, addressed <br />the City Council, reporting that the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad main- <br />tains three tracks at the present structure, two mainlines and one siding, which <br />must be maintained in service during the construction period. Mr. Neill advised <br />that in order to allow for construction of the underpass, the Railroad will de- <br />velop a shoofly arrangement, temporarily moving their three tracks, which will be <br />done in three phases. Mr. Neill then referred to drawings and exhibits indicating <br />the proposed work to be done. Mr. Neill pointed out that an embankment will be <br />constructed on each side of the present railroad tracks allowing one track to be <br />shooflied to the east and two tracks to the west, and the new structure would then <br />be constructed in phases between the shoofly tracks. Mr. Neill advised the cost <br />of the project depends a great deal on the foundation conditions necessary to <br />support the railroad structure, and present investigation indicates that because <br />of the presence of high ground water and hard -bearing materials just below, driven - <br />type piling support is required, or cast and drill-hole piling. <br />Mr. Willian H. Basham, Principal Engineer with C M Engineering Associates, also <br />addressed the City Council stating the present Fogg Street structure is a narrow <br />width underpass structure with approximately a 12 foot vertical clearance and is <br />both inadequate in width and seriously deficient in height, with the roadway being <br />a narrow, two-lane road, restrictive on traffic and a safety hazard. Mr. Basham <br />advised the new construction will provide widening of the roadway to 4 lanes, curb <br />and gutter and a median area, and provide a minimum 15 foot vertical clearance for <br />the bridge, required for the grade separation structures. Mr. Basham also advised <br />that in order to accomplish this proposed structure, it will be necessary to lower <br />the roadway approximately 5 feet. <br />Mr. Basham continued that drainage facilities must be considered in order to con- <br />vey a major amount of storm runoff that presently passes through the present <br />structure southerly towards discharge into the Santa Ana River. Mr. Basham re- <br />ported a preferred alternate is to divert the major amount of storm water tribu- <br />tary to the underpass prior to entering the depressed roadway and thus requiring <br />pumping to the Santa Ana River discharge, and using this method, the pumping re- <br />quirement is minimized to require only the pumping of storm water immediately <br />tributary to the underpass. Mr. Basham also discussed the relocation of various <br />utilities. <br />Director of Community Services Calvin Wang reported it has been determined the <br />bridge construction costs will be substantially more than what was originally <br />estimated at the time the application was filed with the Public Utility Commis- <br />sion and, based on the new cost estimate, the City's 10 percent share of the total <br />project cost will be approximately $310,000. Mr. Wang stated the City currently <br />MAR 17 1981 <br />