1988 DEC 06 REG MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

business, done some minor renovating and conditions have improved. Speaking in opposition to this matter were Mr. Henry Mendoza, 464 West M Street, Colton, and Mr. Roy Roman, 1825 Serrano Court, Colton. Ms. Carolina Rodriguez, 382 South 7th Street, Colton, spoke to the City Council, in Spanish, regarding the Appeal and her business at 328 South 7th Street. Her comments were translated by Community Development Direc- tor Jaime Aguilera. Moved by Councilman Rios, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote. Moved by Councilman Rios, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve Resolu- tion No. R-122-88. Unanimous vote. RESOLUTION NO. R-122-88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON TO DENY AN APPEAL FILED BY MS. CAROLINA RODRIGUEZ REGARDING FILE INDEX NO. D-76-88. Appeal Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open. -, City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that no protests or objections had been received. Community Development Director Aguilera reported on the Appeal filed by John Reichel regarding Tentative Tract No. 14048, located at the south- east corner of Randall and Eucalyptus Avenues, and the Planning Commis- sions denial because the lots as shown were too small. Mr. Aguilera continued that Mr. Reichel contends the map he submitted was an exact duplicate to the 230 lots he processed directly to the south of this tract. Mr. Aguilera stated although Staff agrees with the Planning Commission's desire to have developers build standard size lots, Staff also recognizes that to make such a requirement here would mean this tract would be an island of 46 lots within an area containing 959 lots of simi- lar size. Mr. Reichel has been told that property under his ownership to the east of Pepper Avenue must be developed as standard sized lots, and Mr. Reichel has agreed. Mr. Aguilera said it is, therefore, Staff's recommendation that Mr. Reichel be granted his Appeal, subject to the Conditions of Approval as outlined in the Staff Report to the Plannning Commission. Mr. Aguilera stated if Council concurs with Staff's recommendation, it would be in order to adopt Resolution No. R-123-88, approving the Appeal. If Council wishes to deny the Appeal, a resolution indicating denial would be in order. Mayor Gonzales asked if anyone present desired to speak on this matter. 5