1991 APR 16 ADJ REG MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

making such an event as this a reality. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal (Pacific Coast Properties, File Index No. D-69-87; TT13701) Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open. City Clerk Ramos stated this is a continuation of the Public Hearing and submitted the Affidavit of Posting and reported that no protests or objections had been received. Community Development Director Aguilera reported that this Public Hearing had been continued as it was referred back to staff to have Mr. Le meet with City Manager Sotelo and himself. Mr. Le never contacted the Department or the City Manager. On April 9, 1991, staff contacted Mr. Le and scheduled a meeting for April 12, 1991. Mr. Le did not keep the appointment and contacted the Department on Monday, April 15, 1991. The City Manager was not able to meet with Mr. Le at any time during that day or the next. Mr. Le indicated the reason he was not able to meet earlier was because he was waiting for a report and when received he would need to meet with his attorneys and partners. The report was not available until Monday, April 15. It was suggested to Mr. Le that he could request a two week extension due to these circumstances. The decision before the Council is to determine the appropriate alternative: Denial of an extension, the result will cause the tentative tract to expire or approval of a six month extension, to allow the tentative tract to record. Mr. G.T. Le, President, Pacific Coast Properties, Inc., 950 W. 17th St., Suite C, Santa Ana, addressed two issues: First that the appeal was paid by Pacific Coast Properties. Second he did not return phone calls as he needed to review with his attorney and consultants a report that was not received until April 15. He would like to be allowed time to discuss this report with the people involved. Mr. Le continued to address language of the agreement, assessment of the lots and the original agreement as to the Fire Station. Council Member Roman asked for clarification regarding the Fire Station. Mr. Le indicated that a Fire Station had been part of the agreement which was based on 128 lots but that at the time of the lot size change, City Manager Keane agreed the City would pay for the Fire Station because when the agreement was written up monies for a Fire Station were based on 128 houses not on the final number. Director Aguilera responded that there is no written agreement regard- ing waiver of the Fire Station and the issue here is the extension. If none is granted then this issue is moot. If extension is granted then the Fire Station can be discussed at that time. 4 QPR 16199`