1991 MAY 07 ADJ REG MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Mayor Gonzales opened the floor for discussion on the Urban Water Management Plan for the City of Colton. Moved by Council Member Cisneros, seconded by Council Member Lofy to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote. Moved by Council Member Lofy, seconded by Council Member Rehrer to approve staff's recommendation. Unanimous vote. RESOLUTION NO. R-35-91 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON ADOPTING THE CITY'S URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR 1990-1995. Amendment to O -19A-89 Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open. City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that no protests or objections had been received. Community Development Director Aguilera reported that Ordinance No. O -19A-19 as approved by the voters of Colton in 1990 has several difficiences which can be grouped into several categories: 1) legal issues 2) enforcement by staff; 3) enforcement by the Commission; 4) ambiguities; 5) contradictions and 6) inability of the Ordinance to carry out its purpose of protecting mobile home owners from exorbitant rent increases. The alternatives have been thoroughly dicusssed with legal staff represented by Amy York and Julie Biggs of Best, Best & Krieger and the Mobile Home Rent Review Commission. The changes will not adversely affect mobile home owners or mobile park owners. Impact to the City is negligible since all operating costs are paid for by the registration fees. Mr. Frederickson, Mobile Home Rent Review Commissioner is available for any questions. Mr. Aguilera stated it is the recommendation of staff and the Rent Stabilization Commission to waive full reading and adoption of first reading of ORDINANCE NO. 0-6-91. Mayor Gonzales opened the floor for discussion amending Ordinance No. 0-19A-89. Council Member Lofy questioned whether adverse reaction was expressed by the Rent Stabilization Commission. Mr. Aguilera responded there were two areas of disagreement between the legal staff and the commissioners; these areas are in relation to policy and not legal restriction. The areas of disagreement are in the change in percentages for profit guarantee and the number of signatures on the petition for request of a change. Mr. Fredrickson responded on behalf of the Rent Stabilization Commissioners and addressed the areas of differences. William Kalogonis, 700 East Washington #241, spokesperson for 4 M M 1 1991'