1993 CC MIN JUN 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that no protests or objections were received. Community Development Director Zamora submitted the City's Circulation Element update, mandated by the Mete, as prepared by the consulting firm of Mohle, Grover and Associates. The Environmental Impact Report was transmitted by the consultant to the affected agencies, including the Mate Clearinghouse which has given its approval. The City's Design Review and Traffic Committee and the Planning Commission have reviewed all pertinent materials, The Planning Commission, through their Resolution No. R-3-93, recommended the adoption of the General Plan amendment to update the Circulation Element and the accompanying Environmental Impact Report and the adoption of the 50% category of traffic impact fees outlined in the proposed "Long Range Developer Impact Fee Program." With no response to the call for public comment, motion made by Councilmember Cisneros, seconded by COUncilmember Rios, to close the public hearing. Unanimous vote. Motion made by Council mernber Rios, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to approve File Index Number D-52--92, for the adoption of the update to the Circulation Element, including the Environmental Impact Report, and the adoption of 50% category of Traffic Impact Fees as outlined in the "Long Range Developer Impact Fee Program." Unanimous vote. RESOLUTION NO. R-48-93 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE w _ _ CITY OF COLTON ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN BY UPDATING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT (FILE INDEX NUMBER D- 52-82) STAFF REPORT FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECC+MMENDATICI'L , Finance Director Acevedo identified the Davis Park Improvement site as a vacant lot located vest of the Davis Perk facility. He reported that in April of this year, 22 bid packages were mailed and 5 bids were received and opened on May B, 1593. On May 18, 1993, a meeting was held at the architect's office and the low -bidder discovered he had not ir)cluded the appropriate cost for the tennis court top dressing which would cause him to suffer a considerable loss on the project. On May 21, 1993 he withdrew his bid by certified letter, Aware of time delay, staff recommended that City Council select the option to award the bid to the next lowest, responsive bidder who is Mathis Construction, Inc,, in the amount of $265,535.00. E,V u