1974 REG MTG MIN MAY 7 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

z4 Mr. Huffaker said at this point that in 1969 the Parks Foreman classification was.changed to, Parks Superintendent, which effected a title change only, however, the dutues remained the same. It should be noted that the salaries will remain the same. These salaries are in line with other foreman positions within the City. It is also felt that the title change will more clearly re- flect the duties as described in the attached class specifications. With the establishment of the Parks and Cemetery Superintendent, would be an increase of one position for a total of 17. However, with the reorganization that is proposed in the Department of Public Works through the streamlining of the department and the elimination of duplication of activities, the overall manpower requirements will be reduced in the new budget. It should also be pointed out that under the proposed reorganization of the Department of Public Works, no in- dividual will be laid off or be reduced in salary. The reduction in force will be effected by attrition. The complete reorganization of the Department of Public Works will be presented to the Council for their review during this year's budget considerations. If the Council concurs with the pro- posed recommendations, the following action is suggested: 1. Approve the transfer of the Cemetery and Parks Division to the Department of Public Works. 2. Approve the attached class specifications for the position of Parks and Cemetery Superin- tendent. (This position will . be an unclassified position) 3. Approve the title changes of Parks Superintendent to Parks Foreman and Cemetery Superinten- dent to Cemetery Foreman. 4. Adopt the attached resolution establishing the salary range for the position of Parks and Cemetery Superintendent which will also effect the title changes for the Cemetery Foreman and Parks Foreman. It is felt that, if the recommendation is approved, it will enable the City to provide better services at a lower cost to our citizens. Councilman Gonzales again stated he felt it is wrong to demote one of our department heads, namely the Parks Superintendent, and why go out and advertise for a Parks Superintendent when we already have one, as this is certainly no monetary saving to the City, but additional expenditure of funds. City Manager Huffaker replied that the savings to the City will be effected when the entire re- organization of Public Works is presented, which will be presented to the Council members during the Budget Sessions. Councilman Gonzales said since the proposal that is being presented this evening does, in fact, create an additional position, he would recommend this matter be deferred until after the Budget Sessions so that the Council members can look at the total picture and more review and study can be given to this item. Councilman Gonzales pointed out that when Councilman Rehrer had suggested advertising for a Public Works Director, this was recommended to be held off until the budget sessions also; therefore, he would like to suggest that this matter this evening be postponed until the budget sessions. Mayor Huntoon said he feels that the reorganization of these departments is a very healthy thing and a step ahead for the City. Mr. Huntoon said it has been indicated that no one's position or salary will be effected by the changes. Councilman Hayes stated that he would have to agree with Councilman Gonzales. and hold up on making any decisions until the budget sessions. Councilwoman Spragins felt the reorganization as it is being presented is a very good thing, how- ever, since the budget sessions are so close at hand, she also felt any decisions should be de- ferred until that time. Councilwoman Spragins also suggested hiring a semi -retired woman for office work and assisting visitors at the Cemetery. Mr. Gabe Castorena, Jr., 1299 Redlands Avenue, Colton, stated he has lived in the City of Colton for 32 years, and he feels this reorganization that has been discussed this evening is merely a political move. Mr. Castorena siad he cannot see any justification or reason why the Parks De- partment or the Cemetery Department should be made a part of the Public Works Department. Mr. Castorena siad he would like to ask the question: Can the Public Works Superintendent do a better job than the Parks Superintendent, and isn't the Parks Superintendent a well quali- fied Superintendent doing a good job? Mr. Castorena concluded he feels this is a political move and that this reorganization is going to cost the taxpayers more money. on motion of Councilman Gonzales, seconded by Councilman Rehrer and unanimously passed, Council postponed any dicision on Staff's request to transfer the Cemetery and Parks Divisions to the De- partment of Public Works and establishment of a Parks and Cemetery Superintendent until after the Budget Sessions. imAY 1974.