Laserfiche WebLink
25� <br />Sister City Committee <br />Mayor Beltran said he would like to recommend reorganizing and activating the City's relationship with our <br />Sister City, Cananea, Sonora, Mexico. Mayor Beltran stated there is no purpose in carrying the name of our <br />Sister City on our City's letterhead stationery if we are not going to remain actively involved. <br />Mayor Beltran suggested that a committee be appointed to work with our Sister City, and requested that each <br />Council member think about appointments to such a committee. <br />Councilman Gonzales advised that he has been the City's representative to our Sister City, and that also he <br />has been actively involved with them. Councilman Gonzales further advised that he was told by our Sister City <br />they were going through a period of reorganization, and when this had been resolved they would get in touch <br />with our City. <br />Mayor Beltran said, however, there has been a lack of interest somewhere along the line, and if the City were <br />to form a committee, possibly a husband and wife type of appointment, we may be able to rekindle our relationship <br />with Cananea. <br />Councilman Rehrer felt that Councilman Gonzales, or no one, was to blame for a lack of interest because it <br />seemed as though our Sister City no longer wanted to cooperate. Councilman Rehrer said he knew that Councilman <br />Gonzales had been doing his job as the City's representative, however, Cananea had lost interest in the Sister <br />City program. <br />Mayor Beltran said if this is true, than the City of Colton should find out why and the reasons our Sister <br />City is no longer interested. Mayor Beltran stated that possibly the Sister City program will have to be <br />dropped, however, he felt the City should investigate this matter first and see if a solution can be reached. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br />Assessment District No. 1975-1 <br />Mayor Beltran declared the Public Hearing open. <br />City Clerk Ramos reported that the Notice of Hearing had been given in compliance with the provisions of the <br />Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and that the required Affidavits are on file in her office. <br />Mr. Daniel H. Burnett, Jr.; Project Engineer, advised there were 18 construction bids received on March 11, <br />1976, and opened at 10:00 a.m., and the bid was awarded to Salgado Construction Company in the amount of <br />$81,327.50, the low bidder. <br />Mr. Burnett reported there were 8 bond bids received on March 11, 1976, and opened at 11:00 a.m., and the bid <br />was awarded to Alio Corporation for a total interest and discount of $67,808.81, and a net interest rate of <br />6.4962 percent. <br />Mr. Burnett stated for the benefit of the new Council members, he will summarize what has taken place to date <br />with Assessment District 1975-1. <br />Mr. Burnett said Area "A" (Terrace Avenue) has 20.4 assessment units, at an estimated cost of $1,690. per <br />unit, for a total project cost of $34,476. Area "B" (Tract 7582), has 43.0 assessment units, at an estimated <br />cost of $2,290. per unit, for a total project cost of $98,470., making a grand total project cost of $132,946. <br />Mr. Burnett explained that the unit method was determined to be the most equitable whereby 1 unit, or 1 sewer' <br />service connection, was provided for each 100-150 feet of frontage served by the main sewer line. <br />Mr. Burnett concluded that the bids received, both the construction and bond bids, were very good and, therefore, <br />the assessments will be reduced considerably. <br />City Clerk Ramos announced that a letter of protest had been received from the Temescal Water Company, and <br />each Council member has been given a copy of the letter. <br />Mayor Beltran asked if anyone present wished to speak in opposition or in support of Assessment District 1975- <br />1. <br />Mr. Getz of Corona, California, stated he is in the process of purchasing three 1/2 acre parcels of land, Lot <br />6, Tract 7582, and he asked if someone could explain the procedure for the amount of assessment. <br />Mr. Burnett explained the unit method was used, and for Mr. Getz' property, which are large parcels of land, <br />it would be 3 units each per lot, or 3 times each half acre of land. <br />Mr. Burnett reported on the changes and modifications in Assessment District 1975-1, as outlined in Exhibit <br />"A", attached to and made a part of Resolution No. 3585. <br />Mr. F. MacKenzie Brown, Legal Counsel for Assessment District 1975-1, stated it would now be appropriate for <br />the City Council to adopt the resolution ordering the changes and modifications. <br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Resolution No. 3585. Vote was unanimous. <br />t,/ ' RESOLUTION NO. <br />3585 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND <br />MODIFICATIONS IN PROCEEDINGS AND ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT <br />DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913," <br />(DIVISION 12 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE <br />OF CALIFORNIA). <br />Mr. Brown reported that the written protests received represented a level of less than one percent. <br />Mayor Beltran asked if anyone else desired to be heard. <br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilman Gonzales, the Public Hearing was closed. Vote was unanimous. <br />Mr. Brown continued it would now be in order for the City Council to adopt the resolution overruling and <br />denying the protests. <br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Resolution No. 3586. Vote was unanimous. <br />c,/'RESOLUTION NO. 3586 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS <br />AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. <br />MAR 10976 <br />