|
372
<br />Mayor Beltran asked if anyone desired to speak on this matter.
<br />Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Rehrer, to terminate the Public Hearing. Vote was
<br />unanimous.
<br />Moved by Councilman Hayes, seconded by Councilwoman Cisneros, to approve Resolution No. 3642. Vote was
<br />unanimous.
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 3642 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING
<br />RULE XI OF RESOLUTION 2240 PERSONNEL SYSTEM RULES AND REGULATIONS
<br />FOR THE CITY OF COLTON.
<br />CORRESPONDENCE:
<br />Parade
<br />Chamber/Christmas
<br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Chamber of Commerce request to hold Third
<br />Annual Christmas Parade on Saturday, December 11, 1976, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Vote was unanimous.
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
<br />Conditional Use Permit
<br />P. C. Res. No. 818
<br />Planning Director Williams advised that the Conditional Use Permit application, requested by the Colton Iron
<br />and Metal Company, involves expanding their business to include an auto dismantling operation, on approximately
<br />4 acres of land located at 790 East "M" Street, on the south side of "M" Street between Mt. Vernon Avenue and
<br />the Lytle Creek Flood Control Channel.
<br />Mr. Williams reported the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter, October 12, 1976, and
<br />recommended approval of the application as outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No. 818.
<br />Mr. Williams then advised that the applicant's legal counsel, Mr. Meek, telephoned his office requesting that
<br />this matter be held over to the next regular Council Meeting of November 16, 1976, due to the fact that he
<br />could not be present at the meeting this evening, and he would like to personally appear before the City
<br />Council on this item.
<br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilwoman Cisneros, to continue Planning Commission Resolution No.
<br />818, Conditional Use Permit, C-10-76, to the next regular Council Meeting, November 16, 1976. Vote was unanimous.
<br />Assessments
<br />Cooley Ranch District
<br />Mr. Williams stated that Mr. Michael Whipple, of Stone and Youngberg, Municipal Financing Consultants, is
<br />present this evening to present to the City Council three separate items for their approval with regard to the
<br />Cooley Ranch Assessment District.
<br />Mr. Williams advised it should be noted by the City Council that the Planning Department has made a Negative
<br />Declaration with regard to the Cooley Ranch Project.
<br />Mr. Whipple stated the first item he would like to present to the City Council is the Petition signed by the
<br />property owners in the assessment district for the construction of the public improvements, along with the
<br />Certificate of Circulator of Petition and the map.
<br />Mr. Whipple continued the second item for consideration and approval by the City Council is the Special Counsel
<br />Agreement between the City of Colton and the Agency for the Assessment District, F. MacKenzie Brown, Attorney.
<br />Mr. Whipple concluded the last item for consideration and approval by the City Council is the Resolution
<br />approving the map and directing the filing of this map, which shows the boundaries and delineates the im-
<br />provements to be made in the assessment district.
<br />Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve and authorize Mayor to sign Special
<br />Counsel Agreement between the City of Colton and the Agency, F. MacKenzie Brown, Attorney, for Assessment
<br />District No. 1976-1, Cooley Drive. Vote was unanimous.
<br />Moved by Councilman Hayes, seconded by Councilwoman Cisneros, to approve Resolution No. 3646. Vote was unanimous.
<br />RESOLUTION NO.
<br />3646 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL
<br />NATURE, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
<br />IMPROVEMENT WORK AND SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE DIS-
<br />TRICT TO BE ASSESSED FOR CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES OF SAID IM-
<br />PROVEMENT.
<br />Mayor Beltran asked what action was needed with regard to the Petition that had been presented.
<br />Mr. Whipple answered the Petition is a request from the property owners to the City Council to initiate the
<br />proceedings for this assessment district, and there is no action necessary, other than having presented it to
<br />the City Council, and to be filed.
<br />Nuisance
<br />Odor
<br />Mr. Williams gave a Staff report on the odor problems from Engineered Fiberglass, and referred to a letter
<br />received from Mr. C. D. Myers, President of Engineered Fiberglass, Inc., dated October 27, 1976, outlining
<br />steps that are being taken to help alleviate this problem.
<br />Mr. Williams advised that since September 15, 1976, the city has received only 4 complaints on offensive
<br />odors, and the A.P.C.D. has stated that unless the City receives complaints on a regular basis, or a suffi-
<br />cient amount of complaints, they will not make routine investigations.
<br />After discussion, Council instructed Staff to continue with their investigations on this matter.
<br />Planning
<br />Spheres of Influence
<br />Mr. Williams reported from his memorandum regarding a proposed policy program which is intended to promote
<br />better planning relations with the cities and the County, and a Policy Statement which has now been approved
<br />by the Board of Supervisors.
<br />N0V 1976
<br />
|