|
Mr. Williams advised that at the public hearing, held January 11, 1977, the Planning Commission recommended approval
<br />of the Conditional Use Permit application, subject to twenty conditions, as outlined in Planning Commission Resolu-
<br />tion No. 825, the first condition being that the original Conditional Use Permit, No. C-8-70, be declared revoked
<br />and become null and void.
<br />Moved by Councilman Rehrer, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 825. Vote
<br />was unanimous.
<br />Conditional Use Permit
<br />Planning Commission Resolution No. 824
<br />Mr. Williams stated this Conditional Use Permit application, requested by Edwin A. Carroll, concerns the establishment
<br />of an auto dismantling yard in an existing storage yard, located westerly of Rancho Avenue and La Cadena Drive,
<br />south of the City's Waste Treatment Plant, and north of the Santa Ana River.
<br />Mr. Williams advised that both Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit,
<br />subject to nine conditions, as outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No. 824.
<br />Councilwoman Cisneros stated she would like to suggest the addition of certain items to the conditions as listed on
<br />Page 2 of Resolution No. 824, Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7, as follows:
<br />4. Add - "to be maintained in a satisfactory condition".
<br />5. Add - "or not to exceed 6 feet".
<br />6. Add - "Hours of operation for the Dismantling Business, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.;
<br />for the Retail Sales Business, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.".
<br />7. Add - "on a daily basis".
<br />After discussion among Council Members and Staff, moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Hayes,
<br />approving Planning Commission Resolution No. 824, with the additions to Nos. 4, 59 6 and 7 as outlined. Vote was
<br />unanimous.
<br />Conditional Use Permit
<br />Planning Commission Resolution No. 826
<br />Mr. Williams referred to the Conditional Use Permit application requested by American Sportsworld, Inc., to replace
<br />a section of the existing trampolines at Fiesta Village with a bumper boat recreational attraction, on property
<br />located on the north side of Washington Street, adjacent to the I-15 East Freeway.
<br />Mr. Williams said the Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit application,
<br />subject to ten conditions, as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 826.
<br />Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Rehrer, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 826.
<br />Vote was unanimous.
<br />COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
<br />Subdivisions
<br />Tract #9639
<br />Community Services Director Earl Young requested Council approval of Tract No. 9639, which is a single lot subdivi-
<br />sion, located west of Mt. Vernon Avenue, south of the Reche Canyon Flood Control Channel, and is a part of the
<br />Cooley Ranch Development. Mr. Young also requested Council approval authorizing the Mayor to sign an agreement with
<br />the developer when the bond securities have been received.
<br />Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Hayes, approving Tract No. 9639, and authorizing the Mayor
<br />to sign Agreement between the City of Colton and Colton, Ltd., by R.A.V., Inc., when the bond securities are re-
<br />ceived. Vote was unanimous.
<br />Assessments
<br />Assessment District No. 1976-1 (Cooley Drive)
<br />Mr. F. MacKenzie Brown, Legal Counsel for the Assessment, advised there are five resolutions for consideration and
<br />approval by the City Council this evening, along with the Engineer's Report, regarding Assessment District No.
<br />1976-1 (Cooley Drive).
<br />Mr. Brown stated the Petition received from the property owners requesting formation of the Assessment District has
<br />been received, and it would now be in order for the City Council to adopt the Resolution acting on this Petition.
<br />Moved by Councilman Hayes, seconded by Councilwoman Cisneros, to approve Resolution No. 3660. Vote was unanimous.
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 3660 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING FINDINGS ON PETITION.
<br />ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1976-1 (COOLEY DRIVE)
<br />Mr. Brown advised the next resolution for consideration and adoption is the Resolution of Intention, ordering the
<br />construction of improvements within the assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
<br />Improvement Act of 1913", and providing for the issuance of bonds.
<br />Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Resolution No. 3661. Vote was unanimous.
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 3661
<br />- RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF
<br />CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT
<br />WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
<br />PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVE-
<br />MENT ACT OF 1913:" DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL
<br />OR ORDINARY BENEFIT AND DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED
<br />TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; DETERMINING LIQUIDATED
<br />DAMAGES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
<br />Mr. Daniel H. Burnett, Superintendent of Streets, then gave the Engineer's Report, which consisted of four parts,
<br />reviewing the plans and specifications for the proposed improvements, and the estimated costs and expenses, indi-
<br />cating a total construction cost of $414,247.21, total incidental expenses of $100,752.79, for a total estimated
<br />cost and expenses and balance to the assessment of $515,000.00. Mr. Burnett then reviewed the diagram of the
<br />Assessment District, showing the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of land within, concluding with a
<br />description of the works of the improvements.
<br />JAN 1 E 1977
<br />
|