1986 CC MIN SEP 02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

251 not result in a salary change. The Customer Service Representative I is a new entry level class that will be used for recruitment and train- ing. It is recommended that this class salary be set 10 percent below that of the Customer Service Representative II. Mr. Benest concluded Staff recommends approval of the proposed job des- criptions and reclassifications as outlined, and approval of Resolution No. R-134-86. Mayor Huntoon asked if anyone desired to speak on this matter. Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Rehrer, to ter- minate the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote. Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Rios, to approve Resolution No. R-134-86, and Staff's recommendations as outlined. Vote was unanimous. RESOLUTION NO. R-134-86 - A RESOLUTION OF THE -CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING RESOLUTION NOS. R-37-86 AND R-54-86. CORRESPONDENCE: School Fees Mayor Huntoon referred to letters from Reid & Hellyer, legal counsel for developers, Matich and Coussoulis, and from Parker & Covert, legal counsel for the Colton Joint Unified School District. Mayor Huntoon stated that although this was not a public hearing, he would invite anyone that desired to speak. Mr. James J. Manning, Jr., from the Law Offices of Reid & Hellyer, said they are representing Martin Matich and Nicholas Coussoulis, successors in interest to Metropolitan Development Corporation, concerning a dis- agreement with the Colton Joint Unified School District of a school fee agreement entered into on February 14, 1984, whereby their clients agreed to pay $500.00 in school mitigation fees for each dwelling unit con- structed in Tract Nos. 12563-12576. Mr. Manning stated they have been informed by the School District that, pursuant to Provision V of the Agreement, the District was demanding that the sum of $2,122.17 be paid on each lot in the Tract. Mr. Manning continued litigation is likely and the City could be caught in between. Mr. Manning advised their clients will pay the full amount under protest, and shortly thereafter they would proceed with litigation. Mr. Manning said they are requesting that the City hold these funds in trust pending the litigation, and their clients would indemnify the City for any costs incurred. Mr. Russell I. Dickinson, Superintendent of the Colton Joint Unified School District, spoke to the Council Members stating they are con- cerned about the resolution of this agreement, that the contract and and conditions are clear, and what has been proposed is no different than what has been going on with other developers. Mr. Dickinson said he does not see why the City should be placed in the middle of this matter, however, he felt the City should enforce its Ordinance and Res- olutions. Councilman Rios stated he felt that if the City held these fees in a trust fund, it would not negatively effect the School District at this point. SEP 2 )986 Ms. Wendy H. Wiles, from the Law Offices of Parker & Covert, stated she was representing their clients, the Colton Joint Unified School District, and requested that the fees in question be held by the School :E District rather than the City. Ms. Wiles referred to Resolution No. 4630, adopted by the City Council on July 2, 1985, approving a school impaction fee of $2,122.17 per unit, which developers are required to pay. Ms. Wiles concluded they are requesting that the fees in question be held by the School District. Councilman Rios stated he felt that if the City held these fees in a trust fund, it would not negatively effect the School District at this point. SEP 2 )986