2008 RES R-95-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on August 19, 2008 the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Appeal at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Appeal were heard, and the Appeal was comprehensively reviewed and considered; and occurred. WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have BE IT NOW THEREFORE RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Denial of Appeal. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented and/or on file with the City, including but not limited to the City Council Agenda Report accompanying this item, the Planning Commission staff report dated July 22, 2008, the findings made in this Resolution and by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. R-04-08, the FREIR and the comments and responses thereto, the Revised Final Environmental Impact Report for the Facility ("Revised FEIR"), the Revised Draft EIR dated March 2006 ("Revised DEIR"), the Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2002111002) ("Draft EIR"), City Council Resolutions No. R-84-06 and R-85-06, Planning Commission Resolution No. R-05-06, the Planning Commission Agenda Report dated August 24, 2004 pertaining to the Facility, and the Planning Commission Agenda Report dated June 13, 2006 pertaining to the Facility, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal and confirms and upholds the approval of the Application which provides for the Modification to conditional use permit No.C-5-86 (File Index No. DAP -000-794), subject to the conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission. SECTION 2. General Plan Consistency of Application. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented and/or on file with the City, including but not limited to the City Council Agenda Report accompanying this item, the Planning Commission staff report dated July 22, 2008, the findings made in this Resolution and by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. R-04-08, the FREIR and the comments and responses thereto, the Revised FEIR, the Revised Draft EIR, the Draft EIR, City Council Resolutions No. R-84-06 and R-85-06, Planning Commission Resolution No. R-05-06, the Planning Commission Agenda Report dated August 24, 2004 pertaining to the Facility, and the Planning Commission Agenda Report dated June 13, 2006 pertaining to the Facility, the City Council hereby finds that the Application is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Colton because: The proposed Modification is in accord with the Colton General Plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the land use designation in which the Site is located. The proposed Modification clarifies that the Applicant is authorized to utilize any of the Approved Processes for the treatment of shredder fluff. Such an amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the Site (see August 24, 2004, Planning Commission Agenda Report at pp. 4-5; and June 13, 2006, Planning Commission Agenda Report) and the following general plan goals, principles and policies: 1 . Land Use Element - General Objective No. 1 (pp. 2-12). "To create a land use pattern which provides ... a balanced hierarchy of 'land uses which will service the consumer and economic needs of the City and region; a strong industrial base highly competitive within the area's labor force pool and industrial growth market.... " -3-